If you ran wizchan (14)

1 Name: Anonymage : 2016-02-28 18:07 [Del]

  1. I would monitor wizchan 24/7 like a supreme autist doing my best to make sure normies wouldn't be allowed, checking each users post history and use my best judgment of knowing who is a normie and who isn't
  2. Change required age to post to 18 to 21, or possibly 25
  3. Ban polfags, they belong in cuckchan
  4. /lounge/ and /b/ would be used as a honeypot to filter out normies who appear to be capable of only the shittiest of shitposting, memeposting, etc
  5. Rule 3 would be much more strictly enforced
  6. Bans would almost always be permanent, and would only be reversed if the wizard could truly prove his wizdom and vows to make wizchan better by making quality posts
  7. I would actually read /meta/ and try to improve the site

I would be a tyrannical ruler, but it would be for the best to protect wizchan from this ongoing onslaught of /cow/, /int/ and /r9k/posters from shitting up the site further.

2 Name: Anonymage : 2016-02-28 18:10 [Del]

I don't think I'd last long on your Wizchan

3 Name: Anonymage : 2016-02-28 18:18 [Del]

i would make it a full imageboard, and remove greentext and other chan-like attributes.

And ban everything you mentioned.

4 Name: Anonymage : 2016-02-29 14:41 [Del]

So basically you'd cripple the site and make it even more of a target? Were you a mod back in the day by any chance?

5 Name: Anonymage : 2016-02-29 16:06 [Del]

You will repeat the mistakes of the shortly lived Warlockchan.

Face it, you don't fit on this world.

6 Name: Anonymage : 2016-02-29 21:44 [Del]

Force convert all users to Christianity.
Every time they post, a captcha window pops up, and the user must type in that they accept Jesus as their savior.
If they ever even HINT that they committed a sin, they are EXCOMMUNICATED FROM WIZCHAN

7 Name: Anonymage : 2016-03-01 03:36 [Del]

I'd ban everyone who want to run wizchan and is not me.

8 Name: Anonymage : 2016-03-02 04:34 [Del]

I don't think I'd last long as a ruler, I really don't have it in me.

But if I reigned supreme I would change all boards to texboards, except for /meta/ would be deleted and the unlisted boards would stay. I don't think anything needs to be added but enforce the no shitposting and quality guidelines because they are not at all.

But I don't have it in me to be assertive and dominant over others so it's not happening. Not like it would regardless, but even if the chance arose, I would turn it down.

9 Name: Anonymage : 2016-03-02 15:26 [Del]

Do you understand if you enforce a load of bullshit rules everyone will just leave and you'll have a dead site?

t. Wizchan owner

10 Name: Anonymage : 2016-03-03 06:28 [Del]

I'd enforce the rules and not to the letter but to the spirit so that annoying fags ruining threads or bait threads with enough separation from blatancy to circumvent the rules would get hit with a ban. The rules are fine as they are, the site's core isn't too bad, it's just a matter of cleaning out the trash and scrubbing the dirt out of the corners.

11 Name: Anonymage : 2016-03-05 03:50 [Del]

>Ban all may mays
>Ban /pol/tards

12 Name: Anonymage : 2016-03-06 00:22 [Del]

I would shut it down again.

13 Name: Anonymage : 2016-03-06 05:16 [Del]

I would do everything you said, but although most bans would be permanent, not every single ban would be permanent. Also think anyone that disagrees with you or won't last long with those rules is probably 18 or part of the cancer to this site.

14 Name: Anonymage : 2019-10-14 12:26 [Del]

The same moral police officer who earns $24,000 per year and says that he loves the Bill of Rights might be happy to torture if he was paid $100,000 a year.

Leave these fields empty (spam trap):